
Legal & General Adviser Protection – site refresh
A revised information architecture that clearly demonstrates the business proposition. Of which has been deeply researched into how we can best support our customers at any given point in their journey.
The problem
"The online web content within the Adviser protection space is providing unnecessary pain and friction for customers. The overall information architecture does not align to mental models, leaving advisers feeling lost and overwhelmed while navigating the site."
The vision
A revised information architecture that clearly demonstrates the business proposition. Of which has been deeply researched into how we can best support our customers at any given point in their journey.
Role
Experience Designer, working collaboratively with colleagues across UX disciplines, e.g content designers, user researchers and business stakeholders.
Research & Empathise
To understand the various problems to solve from a customer, business, and technology perspective, I facilitated a remote kick-off workshop with a number of key stakeholders. The output created a sense of alignment and a north start vision to work towards.
I truly value the importance of research as part of any design project. With the volume of work required, I spent a considerable amount of time in the discovery phase to fully adopt the mindset of our target audience.
Areas explored
-
Analytics data
-
Menu navigation behaviours
-
Wider in-page interaction
-
CSAT rating exploration
-
Competitor analysis
-
Content review
-
Depth interviews
As mentioned above, I was able to get agreement with the business to organise and facilitate a series of depth interviews over a two week period.
Research goals
-
To validate the goals, behaviours, and expectations of Protection advisers to inform the creation of personas
-
To validate the proposed adviser sales cycle
-
Understand if the navigation and labelling matches/differs to users’ mental models
-
What in terms of content, is most / least helpful to advisers
-
Recommendations for improvement to support adviser journey
Define
The output from the discovery phase allowed me to prioritise the most important problems to solve, understand the goals, behaviours and expectation of our users and clearly communicate opportunities to our stakeholders.
Post interview affinity diagrams


Persona development


I spent a considerable amount of time running tree tests and card sorts with a panel of end users (Protection advisers) to establish a revised information architecture that was both customer-centric and aligned to mental models.
Ideate
Creating visual displays from card sorting outputs enabled stakeholders to understanding how advisers were grouping content. I began sketching concepts for new page designs, working alongside our UI Designer to create a higher fidelity view to share back with stakeholders. This was an iterative exercise where we began refining our designs based on cms constraints and user testing insights.
Prototype/test
I ran a series of usability tests with the same panel of advisers from our early discovery phase to validate design ideas. Mapping out several core journey that had been established from research, that would enable us to further refine our designs as needed.
What would I do differently?
I ran a design retro with the core working group to celebrate the success of collaborative work but also to identify what could be done differently. As a team we identified the following,
-
Definition of roles and responsibilities early on
-
Develop ways of working to allow for external collaboration
-
Delegation of work to avoid overload within the working group